photo gallery
site map
contact us
  andes coast amazon galapagos islands
about ecuador
travel in ecuador
business in ecuador
living in ecuador
about us
ecuador links
National parks
introduction pre-columbian conquest colonial era
independence republic conservatism liberals
chaos postwar era constitution military rule
democratic new era

Throughout its history, Ecuador has displayed continuity through traditional cultural and economic patterns as well as social and political interaction among the country's highly heterogeneous social groupings. Modern patterns merely overlay the traditional, making present-day Ecuador a veritable living museum displaying its varied and rich heritage. Pre-Columbian Ecuador is reflected in the persistence of native languages, customs and economic activities among a considerable though diminishing number of communities in the Sierra (Andean highlands) and the Oriente (eastern region). The legacy of three centuries of Spanish colonial rule is also pervasive and includes a social inequality that largely coincides with race, rural land tenure patterns, and the nation's dominant European cultural expressions.

Analysts of Ecuador's post-independence political history have pointed to a number of persistent factors. Regionalism is especially prominent and is particularly expressed in the struggle for power between La Sierra represented by Quito, and La Costa (coastal region) represented by Guayaquil. Regionalism has coincided with the party struggle between the Quito-based Conservatives and the Guayaquil-based Liberals. Personal idealism which stems from the political prominence of military caudillos in the early years of the republic to the civilian dictators and the populists of more recent times has been another persistent theme since independence.

Perhaps the most consistent element of Ecuador's republican history has been its political instability. In just over a century and a half there have been no fewer than eighty-six changes of government, which is an average of 1.75 years in power for each regime. The 1979 Constitution is Ecuador's seventeenth national charter. Ecuador's political instability is a product of the struggles mentioned above combined with the important political role maintained by the nation's armed forces. The longest periods of civilian constitutional rule were between 1912 and 1925 and again between 1948 and 1961. As a result, governmental institutions have had little opportunity to mature into established expressions of civilian democratic rule.

Ecuadorian economic history has displayed marked cycles of "boom" and "bust" based on the rise and fall of particular export products. The longest lasting boom which began in the last years of the nineteenth century and lasted until the early 1920s resulted from Ecuador's near monopoly on the production and exportation of cacao. An on-again off-again banana boom punctuated the decades of the 1950s and 1960s, whereas the oil boom - the most pronounced as well as the shortest of all the boom periods - lasted from 1972 until 1979. The sudden end of the oil expansion coincided with the onset of a foreign debt crisis bred by massive foreign borrowing by two successive military governments (1972-79) and by Jaime Roldos Aguilera's regime (1979-81).

Although petroleum revenues brought about significant social change by generating a sizable middle class, the widely anticipated political changes were less apparent. The populist Roldos and Conservative Leon Febres Cordero Ribadeneyra (1984-88) represented traditional elements. However, other prominent post-boom personalities such as Osvaldo Hurtado Larrea (1981-84) did espouse more modern, centre-left ideologies. Still, prosperity from petroleum strengthened the state's traditionally weak fiscal system and promised to tilt the regional balance of power significantly toward the nation's capital.

The intensity of the political struggle commonly played out between the president and Congress during periods of civilian rule did not seem to diminish after 1979. Perhaps the central unanswered question of the 1980s was whether the armed forces would persist in their historically active political role, or would they be content to operate from the sidelines without directly intervening in the political process.

Last updated 28th September 2007 (CMS)

   copyright © hipecuador.com
   all rights reserved
terms & conditions | privacy policy | news | search | faq/help | contacts  
Advanced search :: 
created by cafe design